GAZA, (PIC)– Hamas described as a “crime” the Israeli assault on “Yunus Grandchildren” neighborhood in Alezariya in occupied Jerusalem at dawn Sunday.
The movement was commenting in a statement on the Israeli military attack on the neighborhood set up by Palestinian activists and bulldozing it.
Hamas strongly condemned the act and the assault on activists who were defending their land that is threatened with confiscation and usurpation.
It said that such “desperate attempts” would not deter the Palestinian people from demanding their rights and challenging settlement plans.
Hamas charged the world community with collusion for its silence vis-à-vis the Israeli blatant robbery of occupied Palestinian land and Judaization attempts.
The movement warned of serious consequences of such “Zionist crimes”, and called on the Palestinian people to remain steadfast and to defend their land and holy shrines.
- March 20, 2013 | Palestinians install protest village to greet US President Barack Obama – IMEMC
Israeli forces waking to #AhfadYounes right now attack is going to happen tonight.
As Obama leaves, the "normal" ethnic cleansing starts again.
A lot of solders waking up to #AhfadYounes right now backed up with more than 50 occupation vehicles and 2 helicopters.
Light Bombs are lighting the Sky of #AhfadYounis Right now.
Everyone is in the middle of the village refuses to leave and chanting in the Zionist faces " we won't leave".
RIGHT NOW: everyone in the village is getting arrested by occupation forces don't know where thay are going to take them.
All #AhfadYounis residents were detained and taken by Israeli forces, no idea where to, yet.
From what I heard some of the activists are going to Ofer and some are going to e dropped at kalandya check point.
RELATED NEWS IN MEDIA
- March 21, 2013 | As Obama lands : Palestinians erect new Bab al Shams neighbourhood – Video
- March 24, 2013 | Army Evicts Palestinian Protest Village - Quds Media
- March 24, 2013 | Israeli Army Evicts Palestinian Protest Village – Qatar News
- March 24, 2013 | Israel dismantles Palestinian protest camp – Al Jazeera
Photos via via Mustafa Barghouti and Oren Ziv/ Acvtivestills.org
- Day 1: New protest village near Jerusalem, Mar. 20, 2013 – Album by ICAI
- Day 2: New protest village near Jerusalem, Mar. 21, 2013 – Album by ICAI
- Day 3: New protest village near Jerusalem, Mar. 22, 2013 – Album by ICAI
- Day 4: New protest village near Jerusalem, Mar. 23, 2013 – Album by ICAI
“States may not deport or transfer parts of their own civilian population into a territory they occupy.”
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in international armed conflicts.
International armed conflicts
The prohibition on deporting or transferring parts of a State’s own civilian population into the territory it occupies is set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention.
It is a grave breach of Additional Protocol I.
Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court, “the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts.
Many military manuals prohibit the deportation or transfer by a party to the conflict of parts of its civilian population into the territory it occupies.
This rule is included in the legislation of numerous States.
Official statements and reported practice also support the prohibition on transferring one’s own civilian population into occupied territory.
Attempts to alter the demographic composition of an occupied territory have been condemned by the UN Security Council.
In 1992, it called for the cessation of attempts to change the ethnic composition of the population, anywhere in the former Yugoslavia.
Similarly, the UN General Assembly and UN Commission on Human Rights have condemned settlement practices.
According to the final report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights Dimensions of Population Transfer, including the Implantation of Settlers and Settlements, “the implantation of settlers” is unlawful and engages State responsibility and the criminal responsibility of individuals.
In 1981, the 24th International Conference of the Red Cross reaffirmed that “settlements in occupied territory are incompatible with article 27 and 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention”.
In the Case of the Major War Criminals in 1946, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg found two of the accused guilty of attempting the “Germanization” of occupied territories.
 Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49, sixth paragraph (cited in Vol. II, Ch. 38, § 334).
 Additional Protocol I, Article 85(4)(a) (adopted by consensus) (ibid., § 335).
 ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(viii) (ibid., § 336).
 See, e.g., the military manuals of Argentina (ibid., §§ 346–347), Australia (ibid., § 348), Canada (ibid., § 349), Croatia (ibid., § 350), Hungary (ibid., § 351), Italy (ibid., § 352), Netherlands (ibid., § 353), New Zealand (ibid., § 354), Spain (ibid., § 355), Sweden (ibid., § 357), Switzerland (ibid., § 357), United Kingdom (ibid., § 358) and United States (ibid., § 359).
 See, e.g., the legislation of Armenia (ibid., § 361), Australia (ibid., §§ 362–363), Azerbaijan (ibid., §§ 364–365), Bangladesh (ibid., § 366), Belarus (ibid., § 367), Belgium (ibid., § 368), Bosnia and Herzegovina (ibid., § 369), Canada (ibid., §§ 371–372), Congo (ibid., § 373), Cook Islands (ibid., § 374), Croatia (ibid., § 375), Cyprus (ibid., § 376), Czech Republic (ibid., § 377), Germany (ibid., § 379), Georgia (ibid., § 380), Ireland (ibid., § 381), Mali (ibid., § 384), Republic of Moldova (ibid., § 385), Netherlands (ibid., § 386), New Zealand (ibid., §§ 387–388), Niger (ibid., § 390), Norway (ibid., § 391), Slovakia (ibid., § 392), Slovenia (ibid., § 393), Spain (ibid., § 394), Tajikistan (ibid., § 395), United Kingdom (ibid., §§ 397–398), Yugoslavia (ibid., § 399) and Zimbabwe (ibid., § 400); see also the draft legislation of Argentina (ibid., § 360), Burundi (ibid., § 370), Jordan (ibid., § 382), Lebanon (ibid., § 383) and Trinidad and Tobago (ibid., § 396).
 See, e.g., the statements of Kuwait (ibid., § 405) and United States (ibid., §§ 406–407) and the reported practice of Egypt (ibid., § 402) and France (ibid., § 403).
 See, e.g., UN Security Council, Res. 446 , 452 and 476 (ibid., § 408), Res. 465 (ibid., § 409) and Res. 677 (ibid., § 410).
 UN Security Council, Res. 752 (ibid., § 411).
 See, e.g., UN General Assembly, Res. 36/147 C, 37/88 C, 38/79 D, 39/95 D and 40/161 D (ibid., § 412) and Res. 54/78 (ibid., § 405); UN Commission on Human Rights, Res. 2001/7 (ibid., § 413).
 UN Sub-Commission on Human Rights, Final report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights Dimensions of Population Transfer, including the Implantation of Settlers and Settlements (ibid., § 415).
 24th International Conference of the Red Cross, Res. III (ibid., § 419).
 International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Case of the Major War Criminals, Judgement (ibid., § 421).