Human Rights Group: “A Dark Day For International Justice”

ICC Office of the Prosecutor decides not to open investigations into situation of Palestine

The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) issued a statement Wednesday expressing its extreme disappointment following the decision by the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) not to open an investigation on the situation in Palestine.

The following is the statement by PCHR:

This situation has been under examination by the Court for more than 3 years; in response to the suspected commission of grave war crimes and possible crimes against humanity in the context of Israel’s 27 December 2008 – 18 January 2009 offensive on the Gaza Strip (Operation ‘Cast Lead’), Palestine lodged a declaration recognizing the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in accordance with Article 12(3) of the Court’s Statute on 22 January 2009.

Following all parties’ proven failure to fulfil their obligations to effectively investigate the crimes committed in the context of Operation Cast Lead, the ICC represented the most appropriate forum to pursue accountability. This was in fact one of the key recommendations of the UN Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, which triggered a complex (and as yet uncompleted) follow-up process at the UN level.

The conclusions of the UN Fact-Finding Mission regarding the suspected commission of international crimes during Operation Cast Lead were substantiated by a number of reports from independent human rights organisations, such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and FIDH, as well as the Report of the Fact-Finding Commission mandated by the Arab League.

The Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC received hundreds of complaints and requests by victims of the attacks on the Gaza Strip seeking the urgent opening of independent investigations at the international level. PCHR and its partners submitted numerous case files on victims’ behalf to the Office of the Prosecutor.
PCHR believes that the ICC Prosecutor has completely failed to address this issue in an appropriate manner.

The admissibility question before the Court – whether Palestine could be considered a State – was unquestionably a difficult one. However, a number of convincing arguments were presented, including that Palestine can be considered a State at a minimum for the purposes of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

PCHR believes that the purpose of the Office of the Prosecutor is to pursue accountability, and to act in the interests of universal justice. The ICC Prosecutor, rather than unilaterally deciding on the admissibility of such investigations, should have immediately referred the question to the Assembly of the States Parties. The two pages decision of the 3 April 2012 indeed acknowledges this point:

‘The Rome Statute provides no authority for the Office of the Prosecutor to adopt a method to define the term “State” under article 12(3) which would be at variance with that established for the purpose of article 12(1).’

The Prosecutor’s decision to act unilaterally – without referring the issue to the Pre-Trial Chamber, the most appropriate body – and the unacceptably long time taken to come out with such a non-conclusive, almost interlocutory decision, raises the suspicion that the Prosecutor was acting not in the interests of justice, but rather on the basis of political considerations. It is hard to escape the feeling that the victims and their representatives were deliberately deceived.

PCHR calls upon Palestine to immediately deposit its instrument of accession to the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

PCHR also calls for other States parties to refer the situation Palestine to the ICC.
Most importantly PCHR calls for all UN bodies, and in particular the UN General Assembly to act consistently in the interests of justice and to conclude the so-called ‘Goldstone process’, by bringing the issue to the Security Council so that it may refer the situation in Israel and Palestine to the ICC.

The victims of this conflict deserve no less.

Public Document

For more information please call PCHR office in Gaza , Gaza Strip, on +972 8 2824776 – 2825893

PCHR, 29 Omer El Mukhtar St., El Remal, PO Box 1328 Gaza, Gaza Strip. E-mail:,


Related Link(s):


Gaza Siege Harshness Continues. Israel’s committing slow-motion genocide ~ by Stephen Lendman – March 23, 2012

For who does not understand the need or concept of resistance of Palestine, recommended read: History of Resistance | The Eagle of Palestine


Gaza Under Attack – March 14, 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – March 13, 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – March 12, 2012Photography
Gazz Under Attack – March 11, 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – March 10, 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – March 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – Feb 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – Jan 2012 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – Dec 2011 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – Oct-Nov 2011 – Photography
Gaza Under Attack – Aug-Sept 2011 – Photography
Gaza Cast Lead Massacre – Photography

Israel is not looking for Peace



Martyred By Israeli Occupation Attacks

انّا للہ و انّا الیه راجعون

May Allah Subhana wa Ta’ ala grant the Shuhada Jannatul Firdaus, and ease it for their families, loved ones and anyone around them. Allahumma Ameen ya Rabbil Alameen. ‘ Inna Lillahi wa ‘ Inna ‘ Ilayhi Raji’un, Allahu Akbar


* The list of shuhada does not display, the numerous victims of the zionist occupation which are undocumented by media. Nor it displays the victims of the “silent onslaught” due to restrictions of movement, ability to go to hospitals for treatment or life saving surgery, due to lack of medication because of the blockades and so on. For example: The Slow Motion Genocide by the Siege on Gaza only, killed 600 patients since Gaza got under Israeli Siege.

For an overview of All Israeli Massacres Palestinians go here

Neither does this list, display the avoidable mortality. A clear and statistical factual evidence, about the number of deaths due to indecent ruling by occupation forces. For even an occupier has obligations under International Laws, Geneva Convention and the Hague regulations, which it is neglecting. These circumstances, together with deliberate policies of the occupier to neglect and even deny every basic human right, severes avoidable mortality which is totally silenced by media or reporting organisations. While in the Holocaust, 1 on 6 Jewish people directly died of deliberate neglect, so if we believe the facts over 1 million due to avoidable mortality, neither should these same circumstances be ignores which are ongoing in Palestine. For this report displays a avoidable morality of at least 0,5 million Palestinians.

How many more dead corpses of Palestinians does the international community need to see in order to act? How many more cruelties and violations of Human Rights, Regulations and International Law will be needed to intervene so this ongoing warcrime is being stopped once and for all.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: