Saturday August 16, 2014 01:12 by IMEMC & Agencies
The Israeli side presented a 7-stage plan to Egyptian mediators who, in return, handed it to the Palestinian negotiators. Palestinian sources said that the plan is practically filled with threats and attempts to intimidate the Palestinian people.
Palestinian sources say that the document did not include opening the Rafah Border Terminal with Egypt, and has a condition which links the opening of other crossings, with the signing of a detailed agreement between Palestinian officials, without providing a time frame.
The document also refrained from mentioning anything about the allowance of a transfer of funds which would provide salaries to government employees in Gaza, while Israel insists on keeping the so-called “buffer zone” it has effectuated over time, deep into the northern and eastern areas of the Gaza Strip, on the expense of Palestinian lands, homes, farmers and workers.
The proposed plan also rejects the allowance of Palestinian fishers to fish within 12 nautical miles off the Gaza shore, and disregards the release of political prisoners while, at the same time, highlights posts as issues which are not considered a priority, and could be discussed at a later state.
Ma’an News Agency has said that the Palestinians have presented a plan for lifting the siege on Gaza, to include the following points:
1. The unified Palestinian government pays the salaries of the employees and pensioners in the Gaza Strip, and all government ministries should be allowed to operate normally.
2. The Palestinian leadership continues to file international applications to join more UN institutions, and international treaties.
3. Allowing the deployment of 1,000-3,000 presidential guards at the Rafah Border Terminal with Egypt.
4. Moving the conference meant for the rebuilding of Gaza, from Norway to Egypt, in order to facilitate and speed the reconstruction of the region.
5. The Foreign Ministry should be free to sign agreements with countries around the world, and to decide official relations with Latin American countries.
6. Signing an agreement between the State of Palestine and the Egyptian Republic regarding border terminals.
7. Continuance and conclusion of talks regarding the international airport and seaport which would be built in Gaza.
(This airport closed in 2001, after being repeatedly bombarded and bulldozed by the Israeli army).
Spokesperson of the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, Yousef al-Hasayna, stated that he expects a comprehensive ceasefire agreement to be signed directly, after the current five-day ceasefire ends Monday, adding that any Israeli violation will be met with fierce retaliation.
Talking to the Ma’an News Agency, Yousef al-Hasayna stated that Egyptian mediators asked Palestinian negotiators to grant a 5-day truce, also implemented by Israel, to offer the chance of Egyptian teams to resolve what has been described as “technical issues”.
Al-Hasayna added that indirect Palestinian-Israeli talks managed to reach a milestone in marathon negotiations which aim to end Israeli aggressions on Gaza, as well as lifting the economically crippling Israeli siege on the coastal region.
He stated that issues which have been resolved are, in fact, facilitating the end of the Gaza siege, allowing the entry of construction supplies into the coastal region, and increasing the allotted Palestinian fishing zone.
As for Palestinian demands in regard to establishing a seaport and rebuilding the Gaza International Airport, al-Hasayna stated that all of these issues would be discussed one month after signing the official ceasefire deal.
Egypt and the United States have supposedly provided “guarantees” which ensure the implementation of the agreement, while al-Hasayna stated that the Islamic Jihad does not trust the United States, because it is “Israel’s partner in the aggression on Gaza, providing Tel Aviv with guns and money”.
“The Egyptians are providing guarantees”, he added, “but the most important guarantee is the resistance.”
He added that Tel Aviv has been trying to impose its own version of a truce, calm versus calm, “but the resistance, the steadfastness of our people, foiled this policy, and managed to become a power that counters Israel’s aggression”.
“Any violation by Israel, any attack, will be met with fierce retaliation”, the official stated.
“The siege on Gaza is an aggression, and ongoing assault, and the resistance has the right to retaliate”.
Your donation helps keep the IMEMC FREE and INDEPENDENT
Click here to donate.
For who does not understand the need or concept of resistance of Palestine, recommended read:
The History of Resistance – The Eagle of Palestine
- Special Topic – All Israeli Massacres on Palestinians
- iRemember… – Confirmed Names of Martyrs Occupation (*)
- Special Topic – Ethnic Cleansing
- Israeli escalation in Gaza – A cover-up for settlement activity
- “Slow Death” -International report: Collective punishment of Gaza has reached critical stage – Incl Full Report PDF
- A “Leaflet” to the World about it’s own “forgotten” Extermination Camp called Gaza
- Gaza Siege Harshness Continues. Israel’s committing slow-motion genocide ~ by Stephen Lendman
THE LEGAL RIGHT OF RESISTANCE
81 Notre Dame Law Review1275(2006). Conducting an in-depth study of the genocide in Darfur, Sudan, and also discussing other genocides, this article details the inadequacy of many of the international community’s response to genocides, such as “targeted sanctions” or international peacekeeping forces. Examining international legal authorities such as the Genocide Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Court of Justice, the article demonstrates that groups which are being subjected to genocide have a legal right of self-defense. International treaties, Security Council arms embargoes, or national gun control laws cannot lawfully be enforced in a manner which prevents self-defense resistance to a genocide in progress, because under international law, the prohibition against any form of complicity in genocide takes legal precedence over lesser laws. With Paul Gallant & Joanne D. Eisen. In PDF.
- The Palestinian Right of Self Defense
- Brayer: The Absolute Right of Palestinian Resistance – Source
- No. Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory – Source
- If Jews in WWII Warsaw would have had rockets: They would have fired them too – by occpal
MYTHS & FACTS ABOUT THE ROCKETS FROM GAZA
- The “Rocket” from Gaza Myth – Photography
- More facts about the Rocket from Gaza Myths – Storify
- Half the story: What @IDFSpokesperson leaves out about #Gaza ~ by @yousefmunayyer
- Israel and #Gaza: Context Behind Projectile Fire ~ by @yousefmunayyer
- Truths and lies behind Israel’s attacks on Gaza and its whining about rockets ~ by @AliAbunimah
- Israel is not looking for peace. Nor talks. But: This
* The list of shuhada does not display, the numerous victims of the zionist occupation which are undocumented by media. Nor it displays the victims of the “silent onslaught” due to restrictions of movement, ability to go to hospitals for treatment or life saving surgery, due to lack of medication because of the blockades and so on. For example: The Slow Motion Genocide by the Siege on Gaza only, killed 600 patients since Gaza got under Israeli Siege.
Neither does this list, display the avoidable mortality. A clear and statistical factual evidence, about the number of deaths due to indecent ruling by occupation forces. For even an occupier has obligations under International Laws, Geneva Convention and the Hague regulations, which it is neglecting. These circumstances, together with deliberate policies of the occupier to neglect and even deny every basic human right, severes avoidable mortality which is totally silenced by media or reporting organisations. While in the Holocaust, 1 on 6 Jewish people directly died of deliberate neglect, so if we believe the facts over 1 million due to avoidable mortality, neither should these same circumstances be ignores which are ongoing in Palestine. For this report displays a avoidable morality of at least 0,5 million Palestinians.
How many more dead corpses of Palestinians does the international community need to see in order to act? How many more cruelties and violations of Human Rights, Regulations and International Law will be needed to intervene so this ongoing warcrime is being stopped once and for all.