Gaza War Postmortems: “We Are Not Enemies on Account of Religion. Our Enemy Is the Occupation” – Hamas Political Head

Israel-Palestine1

Israel’s Operation Protective Edge (OPE) was well-planned premeditated aggression.

It had nothing to do with Hamas rockets. It wasn’t about crushing Palestine’s legitimate government.

Israel needs enemies. When none exist, they’re invented. They’re blamed for Israel’s crimes.

OPE was about preventing Palestinian self-determination. It was to maintain occupation harshness. It was to keep stealing Palestinian land.

It was to expand settlements exponentially. It was to control all valued parts of Judea and Samaria.

It was to keep Palestinians confined on isolated bantustans on worthless scrubland. It was to steal their resources.

It was to assure diaspora Palestinians don’t return. It was to maintain Gaza’s blockade while pretending otherwise when hostilities ended.

It was to have Jerusalem as Israel’s exclusive capital. It was to undermine Fatah/Hamas unity.

It was to give Israel sole prerogative to commit high crimes against peace with impunity.

It was to show Palestinians they’re defenseless against overpowering Israeli might.

It was to wage aggressive wars any time against invented enemies for whatever reasons Israel invents.

It was to enlist popular homeland support for what demands condemnation.

Each side claimed victory. Netanyahu said Hamas was “hit hard and got none of its demands.”

He threatened an even tougher response should there be so much as a “sprinkle” of rocket fire from Gaza.

A late August Shiluv Millward Brown poll on whether Israelis support him showed he plunged from a record 82% high in July to 38% now.

Yedioth Ahronot is Israel’s largest circulation daily. According to columnist Alex Fishman:

“Both sides did not exactly want this campaign. Both sides made all possible errors dragging them into it, and both sides find themselves today returning to square one, where they were at the start of the warfare.”

Hamas military wing spokesman Abu Obeida said:

“Gaza achieved victory because it has done what major armies failed to do. It forced the enemy to retreat.”

“We must know that no voice is louder than the voice of the resistance.”

Hamas political head Khaled Meshal said his organization has many rockets left. Tunnels remain.

“If necessary, if the negotiations fail, we will return to resistance until our goals are achieved,” he said.

Asked how he could claim victory after accepting the same Egyptian-brokered terms he rejected weeks earlier, he said:

“Our demands were just, but in the end we had the Palestinian demands on the one hand and the pain of Gaza’s civilian population on the other.”

“So we agreed to the cease-fire in the knowledge that the siege will be lifted, that the other issues like the seaport and airport will be on the negotiating table in another month, and that the weapon in the hands of the resistance are the guarantees that its goals, above all the building of an airport and seaport, along with the release of the prisoners, will be achieved.”

“This military campaign revived resistance as a realistic possibility for the Palestinian people.”

“This is not the end of the battle to liberate the land. We presented the Palestinian national issue and the siege of Gaza before the international community.”

“The (earlier) peace talks improved Israel’s image in the world, but now the resistance has exposed (its) true face.”

“Israel can no longer present itself as the victim. It has become a burden on the world.”

Meshal praised Palestinian “resistance forces,” saying:

“We shattered the idea of the (Israeli) army that never surrenders. That’s already happened before, but this time it happened to an unprecedented degree.”

“We succeeded in creating mutual, equal deterrence on the basis of pain vs. pain.”

As for disarming, he added:

“No power on earth can disarm the resistance. Israel is not interested in international decisions because Netanyahu is not interested in a political solution.”

Addressing the Israeli public, he said:

“Your leadership lies to you, and acts in the name of its self-interest to survive politically.”

“You need to understand that there is no security as long as the occupation goes on.”

“We are not enemies on account of religion. We respect every religion. Our enemy is the occupation.”

Days before the ceasefire, longtime Israeli collaborator Mahmoud Abbas met secretly with Netanyahu in Amman, Jordan.

It was their first face-to-face meeting since September 2010. No confirmation from either side followed. Netanyahu’s office declined to comment.

Senior PA official Nabil Shaath said Washington pressured Israel into halting hostilities even though terms announced omitted demanding Hamas disarm.

Days earlier, Netanyahu said Israel was pursuing a new diplomatic “horizon.” He declined to elaborate.

Last Sunday, Abbas said he would reveal a “surprise” diplomatic initiative Washington wouldn’t like. It won’t matter.

According to Shaath, the PA wants a Security Council resolution ending Israel’s occupation. It wants a timetable to accomplish it.

Given a certain US veto if this type resolution is presented, Palestinian officials will petition the International Criminal Court (ICC) to prosecute Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon for war crimes.

The ICC is a longtime Western imperial tool. It targets victims. Perpetrators like America and Israel operate freely.

They do so with impunity. Don’t expect this time to be different.

Throughout over seven weeks of conflict, Washington supported Israel’s killing machine.

Its posture belied its rhetorical highminded concern for human rights, democratic values and rule of law principles.

It showed Israel can commit high crimes against peace with impunity. Thousands of mostly civilian Palestinian casualties didn’t matter.

They attest to Israel’s barbarity. They’re considered legitimate targets. International law affirms otherwise.

Large parts of Gaza lie in ruins. Billions of reconstruction dollars are  needed. Where will funding come from?

How many years are required to complete an overwhelming job? How will affected Gazans cope in the meantime?

Will concern for them fade when headlines disappear? Will reconstruction matter after virtually certain future Israel aggression destroys what’s rebuilt?

Without unconditionally lifting Gaza’s siege, ending occupation, assuring Palestinian self-determination within June 1967 borders, and holding Israel fully accountable for genocidal mass murder and destruction, will anything else really matter?

After long denied justice, Palestinians remain isolated on their own. Western leaders able to help do nothing.

They support Israeli genocide. Palestinian suffering doesn’t matter. Premeditated Israeli aggression is considered self-defense.

Big Lies substitute for hard truths. Fundamental rights aren’t important. Wars are glorified in the name of peace.

Israel gets away with genocidal crimes of war and against humanity because nations able to act do nothing.

Expect nothing different this time. Business as usual continues.

Expect long denied Palestinian injustice to persist. Expect future Israeli aggression. Expect Palestinians blamed for its crimes.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs. 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour



 

THE LEGAL RIGHT OF RESISTANCE

Is Resisting Genocide a Human Right?

right-of-resistance-gaza-palestine

Right to Resist

81 Notre Dame Law Review1275 (2006). Conducting an in-depth study of the genocide in Darfur, Sudan, and also discussing other genocides, this article details the inadequacy of many of the international community’s response to genocides, such as “targeted sanctions” or international peacekeeping forces. Examining international legal authorities such as the Genocide Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Court of Justice, the article demonstrates that groups which are being subjected to genocide have a legal right of self-defense. International treaties, Security Council arms embargoes, or national gun control laws cannot lawfully be enforced in a manner which prevents self-defense resistance to a genocide in progress, because under international law, the prohibition against any form of complicity in genocide takes legal precedence over lesser laws.
With Paul Gallant & Joanne D. Eisen. In PDF.
http://www.davekopel.com/2a/Foreign/genocide.pdf


MORAL, HISTORICAL & LEGAL RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE



GENOCIDE & ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINE

gaza-under-attack-photos-album

Genocide in Photos

Since 1937 (Pre)Israel terrorism commits ongoing massacres in Palestine. Violent genocide, but the least known, silent genocide causing excess death by deliberate racist policies of deprivation. The same deprivation which according the Israeli narrative have cost 1/6 of Jewish Holocaust victims (1 of 6 million). The cost in human lives by avoidable mortality for the sake of the creation of Israel according to research (by Dr. Gideon Polya) in Palestine and neighboring countries is 24 million lives.



DEBUNKING THE ISRAELI MYTHS


share-knowledge

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: